Work is full on the Colorado statehouse on a invoice that addresses protection necessities for occupational accident insurance coverage. The Proprietor-Operator Impartial Drivers Affiliation helps the hassle.
Home lawmakers voted 54-8 to approve a invoice to provide owner-operators the choice to buy an occupational accident coverage, generally known as Occ/Acc, as a substitute for employees’ compensation.
The invoice, SB35, now heads to the governor’s desk. The Senate already permitted the invoice by unanimous consent.
Sponsored by Sen. Robert Rodriguez, D-Denver, and Rep. Shannon Chicken, D-Westminster, the invoice would permit a industrial operator who meets sure necessities to buy an occupational accident insurance coverage coverage slightly than a employees’ compensation coverage.
Invoice sponsors wrote within the laws that “the choice is available in different states, however as a result of restrictions in present Colorado legislation related reasonably priced insurance policies can’t be provided in Colorado until a change is made to the legislation.”
They are saying that offering the occupational accident possibility would permit small trucking corporations within the state to compete in neighboring states that already present the choice.
“We shouldn’t have legal guidelines that power these small enterprise house owners to buy pricey services and products that they don’t want,” Chicken advised Home Enterprise Affairs and Labor Committee members. “Our legal guidelines ought to help their entrepreneurial spirit and supply them with protections which might be acceptable for the work they do.”
OOIDA members again change
Mike Matousek, OOIDA director of state legislative affairs, stated the Affiliation represents greater than 2,000 unbiased truck drivers and small motor carriers who dwell in Colorado.
“Our members are typically these which might be immediately impacted by Colorado’s current Occ/Acc necessities, which successfully prohibits them from buying Occ/Acc protection,” he stated.
Matousek advised invoice sponsors that OOIDA has surveyed Colorado members and so they stated resoundingly that they need occupational accident protection as a substitute for employees’ compensation.
“Occ/Acc tends to be a most popular various as a result of it’s extra reasonably priced, gives distinctive advantages, and contains protection for nonwork associated accidents,” Matousek stated in a letter to invoice sponsors. “It’s moveable, which suggests if truck drivers transfer to a different state, they’ll hold their protection.”
He provides that employees’ compensation is dearer, not moveable, and sometimes instances doesn’t replicate the wants of the individual being coated.
Moreover, he identified to lawmakers that almost all owner-operators begin their profession in trucking as an worker driver and in some unspecified time in the future they select to change into an owner-operator.
“Because of this not solely are owner-operators among the many most skilled drivers on the street, in addition they have loads of alternatives to be an worker driver, bust some individuals merely choose to be in enterprise for themselves.”
Matousek stated that owner-operators who dwell in Colorado are in a dilemma, the place they’re unable to buy an occupational accident coverage or paying for a employees’ compensation coverage that may not cowl them if one thing have been to occur.
SB35 would resolve the issue.
Matousek provides that the change was a long-time coming.
“Whereas it was an unnecessarily lengthy course of, Colorado state lawmakers have lastly handed a invoice that may make occupational-accident protection out there to leased owner-operators.”
He credited the work of Greg Fulton and the Colorado Motor Carriers Affiliation, and OOIDA Life Member Rick Ash of Johnstown, Colo., for getting thus far.
Matousek stated that he’s pleased with the help that OOIDA additionally has offered.
“Crew efforts are often extra profitable than going at it alone.” LL
Extra Land Line protection of reports from Colorado.